| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
GOAT
Site Admin
Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 41
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:08 pm Post subject: Players Ranked between 300-400 all-time |
 |
|
Just wondering what you guys think of this group of players. Do any of them seem like they are a notch above or below the rest?
Posts
Elmore Smith
Joe Barry Carroll
Swen Nater
Brad Miller
Kermit Washington
Ray Scott
Rony Seiklay
Forwards
Chuck Person
Kenyon Martin
Richard Jefferson
Bob Rule
Jerome Kersey
Derrick McKey
David West
Wings
Jalen Rose
Jim McMillian
Tayshaun Prince
Geoff Petrie
Purvis Short
Darrell Griffith
Kelly Tripucka
Guards
Kenny Anderson
Nick Van Exel
Ray Williams
Reggie Theus
Damon Stoudamire
Sleepy Floyd
John Lucas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RobertDeMeijer
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 4:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, are you working on a top 400 or so, G.O.A.T.?
I wish I could notice one of these players sticking out, but to me they're all about the same level of greatness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GOAT
Site Admin
Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RobertDeMeijer wrote: |
Wow, are you working on a top 400 or so, G.O.A.T.?
I wish I could notice one of these players sticking out, but to me they're all about the same level of greatness. |
I expanded my top 100 annual list to top 200 last year and am going for 350 this year. I've expanded my database to about 750 players. Right around 300 the lines really get blurred. Moving a player 50 spots up or down in a day is a common occurrance.
The hardest issue is measuring guys you've not seen much and can only find little bits written about. I know nothing of Bob Kaufmann or Glen Combs or Dick Garmaker. Even the groups of 20-30 I have them in are unsatisfying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Götterdämmerung
Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think your criteria for ranking those players can become more objective because we are less likely to have any of them as favorites.
By listing the criteria, say, 10 or 15 of them, then do a checklist for each and voila.
The criteria should be simple:
Stats (contextual)
Versatility
Relative ranking among peers
Team Success
Etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GOAT
Site Admin
Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Posts: 41
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Götterdämmerung wrote: |
I think your criteria for ranking those players can become more objective because we are less likely to have any of them as favorites.
By listing the criteria, say, 10 or 15 of them, then do a checklist for each and voila.
The criteria should be simple:
Stats (contextual)
Versatility
Relative ranking among peers
Team Success
Etc. |
To many questions I can't find the answers for.
Why type of teammate was Bob Rule? How did Purvis Short do the majority of his scoring? Things like this.
It's not that I think there is a correct answer, but there is an order I find satisfying at the end of each year. Especially for the top 75-100. Once I get to that level, I'll be pretty content. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Free Forum
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
